Tällaiseen ei ollenkaan kannattaisi muuten puuttua, mutta tämä tarjoaa tilaisuuden kumota kaikki keskeiset yleensä pienempinä erinä annosteltavat NATO-EU-valheet kerralla.
Miksi Syyrian miehet eivät ole puolustamassa maataan? Katsotaanpa tästä
4. Assadia vastaan taistelevat myös kurdien yhtyneet joukot, jotka yrittävät luoda omaa valtiota Pohjois-Syyrian ja Irakin alueelle.
HM: Valhetta. Kurdit taistelevat ISISiä ja myös Turkkia vastaan! Kurdilue on ollut iät ja ajat Turkissakin toimivan PKK-puolueen linjan johdossa Syyrian hallituksen suostumuksella. Kurdi-alueella ja hallituksella ei ole viereisiä alueita, vaan välillä on "oppositoalueita".
VENÄJÄ TUKEE MYÖS KURDEJA, minkä Putin mainitsi YK:ssakin, ja kurdialueen johtajat ovat käyneet Moskovassa neuvottelemassa yhdessä hallituksen edustajien kanssa.
Kurdit ovat pitäneet matalaa profiilia,millaista vatiollista asemaa he haluavat. Pelkkä oma valtion- pläntti vaikka Pohjois-Syyriassa ei ole keskeinen tunnus. Sellainen ei ole vain Syrian kurdien asia.
7. Turkki pommittaa sortojärjestö Isisiä, joka taas vastustaa kiihkeästi sekä Assadia että tätä vastaan taistelevia kapinallisia.
HM: Paskaista valhetta:
TURKKI ON AINAKIN TÄHÄN ASTI TUKENUT ISISIÄ JA SEN HUIPPUJOKKOA AL-NUSRAA!
POMMITTANUT TURKKI ON IRAKIN KURDEJA!
Kurdit katkaisivat elokuussa ISISin huoltoreitin Turkkiin kahden kurdialueen välistä, ja siitä tämä nykyinen tapahtumien vyöry alkoi.
Turkki on toiseksi tärkein NATO-maa, jota ilman koko NATO ei pysty toimimaan menestykselli- sesti tällä alueella, eikä myöskään Mustanmeren alueella.
Turkin vaaleissa vasemmistolainen kurdipuolue pääsi parlamenttiin vieläpä vaa´ankieleksi ja hallitseva piiloislamistipuolue mentti hallitsevan asemansa.
9. Turkki vastustaa myös kurdien omaa valtiota, koska sen omalla alueella on kytevä kurdikapina, joka haluaisi irrottaa osan Turkista kurdivaltioon. Joten alueen mahtivaltio Turkki - ja Nato-maa - pommittaa paitsi ääri-islamisteja myös niitä vastaan taistelevia kurdeja.
Turkki on koko sodassa itse asiassa niin sekaisin, että sen on väitetty jopa tukeneen Isisiä tai seuranneen sivusta sen toimia, koska maa pelkää niin paljon kurdivaltiota. Ainakaan alueella ei voi olla ihan varma, ketä Turkki seuraavaksi pommittaa.
HM: No tulihan sekin sieltä - että kurdeja pommittaa!!!
Miksi pitää ensin valehdella sama asia, ja sitten kertoa seuraavassa lauseessa kumminkin myös tosi lähes samaan hengenvetoon? Tutkimattomat ovat hölynpölyjournalismin tiet...
10. Yksi koko sotkun Irakin sodalla aloittaneista länsimaista eli Yhdysvallat taas tukee sodassa kapinallisia, joille se on jakanut muun muassa raskaita aseita ja antanut ilmatukea – erityisesti Isisiä vastaan.
HM: EI KUN HAALITUSTA VASTAAN! "Oppositioryhmät" ovat juuri kärynneet USA:n toimittamien aseiden trokaamisesta saman tien ISISille!
11. Sotaan on sotkeutunut myös koko joukko muita maita. Britannia on alueella pommikoneineen, ja Ranska on myös tulossa alueelle.
Isommilla panoksilla mukana on Venäjä, joka taas tukee aseilla Assadia sekä Isisiä että kapinallisia vastaan. Kapinalliset siis ampuvat Amerikan antamilla aseilla Venäjän aseistamia Assadin joukkoja, samalla kun Turkki pommittaa kapinallisten kanssa liittoutuneita kurdeja ja on samalla liitossa Yhdysvaltain kanssa. Kapinnallisryhmien välillä on myös riitoja siitä, kuka saa länsiaseita ja kuka ei – Yhdysvallat on yrittänyt poimia kymmenistä taistelijaryhmistä ne, joiden mielipiteet eivät ole liian äärimmäisiä. "
HM: Kissan paskat USA varsinaisesti välitä kenenkään mielipiteistä! Se katsoo, mikä objektiivisesti pelaa hallitusta, Venäjää ja YK:ta vastaan, ja mikä taas näiden pussiin (muukin kuin aika). Kurdit eivät ole missään erityisliitossa NATO-EU-johtoisten kapinallisten kanssa. Yhteityö ISISiä vastaan kelpaa, mutta hallituksenkin yhteistyökelpaa. Kumpaakaan ei toistaiseksi ole ollut liikaa tarjolla... Kurdittaistelevat perinteisistä asuinsijoistaan.
12. Lisäksi Assadilla on puolellaan esimerkiksi Syyrian palestiinalaiset ja Iranin vallan-kumouskaarti - mainitsimmeko muuten jo, että myös Iran on sotkeutunut sotaan - Hizbollah ja eräitä muita alueellisia voimajärjestöjä. Palestiinalaisten ja Assadin liittouma tosin on syntynyt lähinnä Isisiä vastaan, ja välit ovat muuten horjuvat. Assadin armeijan ytimessä taas ovat alaviitit, joiden uskonto on eräänlainen shiialaisen islamin alahaara. Moni kapinalli- nen on sunnimuslimi, mutta mielipiteiden rajuus taas ulottuu Isisin murhanhimosta maltilliseen kansanvalta-ajatukseen.
13. Itse asiassa sodassa on osapuolia niin paljon, että ei tarvitse kuin hetki googlata niin löytää tämän metrejä pitkän Wikipedia-sivun, jolle yritetään urheasti koota kaikki pelkästään Syyrian alueella toimivat aseelliset ryhmät. Kannataa huomata, että listalla ovat vain Syyrian alueella toimivat ryhmät. Sota jatkuu myös Irakin puolella, jossa osapuolina ovat Isis, maan hallitus, ja sekalainen joukko sunni- ja shiiapataljoonia. Irakin sisällissodan osapuolista on ihan oma listansa.
HM: tuohon listaan ei ole luottamista.
TP: Nyt pääsemme alun kysymykseen eli siihen, miksi alueen miehet eivät ole rintamalla puolustamassa maataan?
Asiaan saattaa varovaisen arviomme mukaan vaikuttaa yllä kuvattu tilanne, jossa naapuritalon jamppa saattaa kuulua tai olla kuulumatta johonkin yllämainituista jengeistä, jonka jäsenet tällä viikolla ovat oman jengisi tappolistalla. Lisäksi jengeistä useampi käy hakemassa kulloinkin hallitsemaltaan alueelta riveihinsä pakolla miehiä, jotka eivät ole värvääjäjengin mielipiteistä välttämättä lainkaan samaa mieltä.
Kapinallisten kymmeniä sotilasjengejä on monta kertaa yritetty yhdistää yhdeksi armeijaksi, ilman mainittavaa menestystä.
Siis: Syyriassa ja Pohjois-Irakissa suurinpiirtein kaikki pommittavat kaikkia, rintamalinjat ovat kaoottisia ja sodankäynti monimutkaista sohimista, jossa voi todella olla hieman vaikea hahmottaa, missä jengissä ylipäänsä edes pitäisi olla.
Mitä sitten tässä tilanteessa pitäisi tehdä?
Maiseman vaihtaminenkin saattaa olla vaihtoehto. "
H: Pakolaisia pitäisi voida laillisesti valikoida esimerkiksi kurdien, kristittyjen ja palestiinalaisten hyväksi.
***
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2023/02/18/698470/Israel-airstrike-Syria-residential-building
" Israel launches new missile strike on Syria’s capital, targets residential buildings, killing civilians
This photo released by Syria’s official SANA news agency shows the aftermath of an Israeli missile strike, which hit residential areas in the capital Damascus and its vicinity, early Sunday, February 19, 2023. (via SANA)
Israel has launched a fresh missile attack on the Syrian capital Damascus and areas around it, as the regime continues its acts of aggression against the Arab country.
According to Syria’s official SANA news agency, the country’s air defenses responded to Israel’s new missile attack, which took place early Sunday, intercepting most of those missiles.
Following the attack, SANA said, the Israeli missiles hit a number of residential buildings mostly in Kafr Sousa neighborhood in central Damascus.
Meanwhile, al-Mayadeen news agency reported that the Israeli strike hit areas in Damascus countryside, Kafr Sousa neighborhood, and Tal al-Masih near the city of Shahba, north of al-Suwayda in southwestern Syria.
A Syrian military source was quoted by SANA as saying that the Israeli missiles were fired from the direction of the occupied Golan Heights, targeting some locations in Damascus and its suburbs, including residential neighborhoods inhabited by civilians. The source said most of the Israeli missiles were shot down by Syria’s air defenses.
Syria's health ministry said five people were killed in the strike, including one soldier, while fifteen others were wounded, some of whom in critical condition.
A Syrian security source was also quoted by SANA as confirming that the country's air defenses had shot down most of the Israeli missiles before they reached their target.
The source added that technical and engineering teams were assessing the damage caused by the new Israeli act of aggression.
Israel frequently carries out missile attacks on targets in Syria, mostly using the airspace of Lebanon or the occupied territories.
Syrian has repeatedly complained to the UN over Israeli assaults, urging the Security Council to take action against Tel Aviv’s crimes. The calls have, however, fallen on deaf ears.
In early November 2022, Syrian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Faisal Mekdad emphasized that his country will definitely give a crushing response to such acts of aggression at some point in the future.
Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
***
https://orinocotribune.com/how-cia-and-mi6-created-isis/
" How CIA and MI6 Created ISIS
By Kit Klarenberg – Mar 30, 2024
Contrary to their mainstream portrayal, as inspired purely by religious fundamentalism, Daeshare primarily guns for hire.
Within just 24 hours of the horrific mass shooting in Moscow’s Crocus City Hall on March 22nd, which left at least 137 innocent people dead and 60 more critically wounded, US officials blamed the slaughter on ISIS-K, Daesh’s South-Central Asian branch. For many, the attribution’s celerity raised suspicions Washington was seeking to decisively shift Western public and Russian government focus away from the actual culprits – be that Ukraine, and/or Britain, Kiev’s foremost proxy sponsor.
Full details of how the four shooters were recruited, directed, armed, and financed, and who by, are yet to emerge. The savage interrogation methods to which they have been, and no doubt continue to be subjected are concerned with prising this and other vital information from them. The killers may end up making false confessions as a result. In any event, they themselves likely have no clue who or what truly sponsored their monstrous actions.
Contrary to their mainstream portrayal, as inspired purely by religious fundamentalism, Daesh are primarily guns for hire. At any given time, they act at the behest of an array of international donors, bound by common interests. Funding, weapons, and orders reach its fighters circuitously, and opaquely. There is almost invariably layer upon layer of cutouts between the perpetrators of an attack claimed by the group, and its ultimate orchestrators and financiers.
Given ISIS-K is currently arrayed against China, Iran, and Russia – in other words, the US Empire’s primary adversaries – it is incumbent to revisit Daesh’s origins. Emerging seemingly out of nowhere just over a decade ago, before dominating mainstream media headlines and Western public consciousness for several years before vanishing, at one stage the group occupied vast swaths of Iraqi and Syrian territory, declaring an “Islamic State”, which issued its own currency, passports, and vehicle registration plates.
Devastating military interventions independently launched by the US and Russia wiped out that demonic construct in 2017. The CIA and MI6 were no doubt immensely relieved. After all, extremely awkward questions about how Daesh were comprehensively extinguished. As we shall see, the terror group and its caliphate did not emerge in the manner of lightning on a dark night, but due to dedicated, determined policy hatched in London and Washington, implemented by their spying agencies.
‘Continuingly Hostile’
RAND is a highly influential, Washington DC-headquartered “think tank”. Bankrolled to the tune of almost $100 million annually by the Pentagon and other US government entities, it regularly disseminates recommendations on national security, foreign affairs, military strategy, and covert and overt actions overseas. These pronouncements are more often than not subsequently adopted as policy.
For example, a July 2016 RAND paper on the prospect of “war with China” forecast a need to fill Eastern Europe with US soldiers in advance of a “hot” conflict with Beijing, as Russia would undoubtedly side with its neighbour and ally in such a dispute. It was therefore necessary to tie down Moscow’s forces at its borders. Six months later, scores of NATO troops duly arrived in the region, ostensibly to counter “Russian aggression”.
Similarly, in April 2019 RAND published Extending Russia. It set out “a range of possible means” to “bait Russia into overextending itself,” so as to “undermine the regime’s stability.” These methods included; providing lethal aid to Ukraine; increasing US support for the Syrian rebels; promoting “regime change in Belarus”; exploiting “tensions” in the Caucasus; neutralising “Russian influence in Central Asia” and Moldova. Most of that came to pass thereafter.
In this context, RAND’s November 2008 Unfolding The Long War makes for disquieting reading. It explored ways the US Global War on Terror could be prosecuted once coalition forces formally left Iraq, under the terms of a withdrawal agreement inked by Baghdad and Washington that same month. This development by definition threatened Anglo dominion over Persian Gulf oil and gas resources, which would remain “a strategic priority” when the occupation was officially over.
“This priority will interact strongly with that of prosecuting the long war,” RAND declared. The think tank went on to propose a “divide and rule” strategy to maintain US hegemony in Iraq, despite the power vacuum created by withdrawal. Under its auspices, Washington would exploit “fault lines between [Iraq’s] various Salafi-jihadist groups to turn them against each other and dissipate their energy on internal conflicts”, while “supporting authoritative Sunni governments against a continuingly hostile Iran”:
“This strategy relies heavily on covert action, information operations, unconventional warfare, and support to indigenous security forces…The US and its local allies could use nationalist jihadists to launch proxy campaigns to discredit transnational jihadists in the eyes of the local populace…This would be an inexpensive way of buying time…until the US can return its full attention to the [region]. US leaders could also choose to capitalize on the sustained Shia-Sunni Conflict…by taking the side of conservative Sunni regimes against Shiite empowerment movements in the Muslim world.”
‘Great Danger’
So it was that the CIA and MI6 began supporting “nationalist jihadists” throughout West Asia. The next year, Bashar Assad rejected a Qatari proposal to route Doha’s vast gas reserves directly to Europe, via a $10 billion, 1,500 kilometre-long pipeline spanning Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey. As extensively documented by WikiLeaks-released diplomatic cables, US, Israeli and Saudi intelligence immediately decided to overthrow Assad by fomenting a local rebellion, and started financing opposition groups for the purpose.
This effort became turbocharged in October 2011, with MI6 redirecting weapons and extremist fighters from Libya to Syria, in the wake of Muammar Gaddafi’s televised murder. The CIA oversaw that operation, using the British as an arm’s length cutout to avoid notifying Congress of its machinations. Only in June 2013, with then-President Barack Obama’s official authorisation, did the Agency’s cloak-and-dagger connivances in Damascus become formalised – and later admitted – under the title “Timber Sycamore”.
At this time, Western officials universally referred to their Syrian proxies as “moderate rebels”. Yet, Washington was well-aware its surrogates were dangerous extremists, seeking to carve a fundamentalist caliphate out of the territory they occupied. An August 2012 US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report released under Freedom of Information laws observes that events in Baghdad were “taking a clear sectarian direction,” with radical Salafist groups “the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.”
These factions included Al Qaeda’s Iraqi wing (AQI), and its umbrella offshoot, Islamic State of Iraq (ISI). The pair went on to form Daesh, a prospect the DIA report not only predicted, but seemingly endorsed:
“If the situation unravels, there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria…This is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want in order to isolate the Syrian regime…ISI could also declare an Islamic state through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create great danger.”
Despite such grave concerns, the CIA inexorably dispatched unaccountably vast shipments of weapons and money to Syria’s “moderate rebels”, well-knowing this “aid” would almost inevitably end up in Daesh’s hands. Moreover, Britain concurrently ran secret programs costing millions to train opposition paramilitaries in the art of killing, while providing medical assistance to wounded jihadists. London also donated multiple ambulances, purchased from Qatar, to armed groups in the country.
Leaked documents indicate the risk of equipment and trained personnel from these efforts being lost to Al-Nusra, Daesh, and other extremist groups in West Asia was judged unavoidably “high” by British intelligence. Yet, there was no concomitant strategy for countering this hazard at all, and the illicit programs continued apace. Almost as if training and arming Daesh was precisely the desired outcome. "
https://orinocotribune.com/ex-isis-chief-appointed-as-commander-of-us-backed-militia-in-syria/
" Ex-Isis Chief Appointed as Commander of US-Backed Militia in Syria
Kommentit